Land : Removal of Caveat.

In applying for a removal of caveat by a registrar, the applicant must use Form 19H accompanied by a prescribed fee.

Upon receiving the application/Form 19H, the registrar shall serve the caveator with a Notice of intention to remove in Form 19C and make endorsement that Form 19C has been served to the caveator on the title, which must be signed and sealed.

The caveator, upon receiving Form 19H must serve to the Registrar with an Order from the court to extend the caveat within 2 months from the date Form 19C was served to him.

After the expiry of 2 months, if the caveator failed to serve the Order for extension, the Registrar shall cancel the caveat. The caveator cannot file another caveat on the same land after the registrar had cancelled the said caveat.
(Further Reading: S.326 of the NLC 1965)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Idiots Introduction to Sijil Faraid.

1.Sijil Faraid (inheritance certificate) is a document which determines the beneficiaries and the allocated portion of inheritance that the beneficiaries shall later receive under syariah law. It serves to assist the administrator in distributing of the inheritance to the rightful beneficiaries according to the right portion. In the case of   Khairuddin bin Abd Rahman & Ors v Malayan Banking Berhad   [2014] MLJU 950 , the Court held the following:  
Read more

An Idiots Introduction to Civil Forgery.

Facts Based on an application form signed and submitted by the Defendant, a personal financing facility known as the Plaintiff’s Personal Financing- for the sum of RM56,000.00, was granted to the Defendant. This facility was granted through the Plaintiff’s Offer Letter dated 16.4.2010 and Facility Agreement dated 20.4.2010. After all the necessary documents, paperwork and forms were processed, a sum of RM56,000.00 was credited into the Defendant’s account on 20.4.2010.   The failure of the Defendant to pay her monthly instalments prompted the Plaintiff to issue a Letter of Demand via its solicitor dated 22.4.2011. Another Letter of Demand was issued on 1.11.2013. Receiving no feedback from the Defendant, a Summons and Statement of Claim was filed against the Defendant on 25.6.2014 for the sum of RM114,176.66. The Defendant filed in her Statement of Defence denying any knowledge of the facility, the receipt of the monies and further claimed that her signatures were forged.
Read more